Hi Olivia!
I think you are on the right track. See if the explanation below makes sense (even without a diagram), and see if it helps get you on track (at least to not getting a calculator error! :) )
The key here is that the angle θ that goes into the formula to find the location of maxima and minima is the same angle such that tan(θ) = y/L, where y is the straight-line distance from the center (bright spot) of the screen out to a given location along the screen, and L is the distance from the screen to the slits.
In this case, the maximum angle θ we can go off-axis and still hit the screen is given by:
tan(θmax) = (half-width of screen)/L (the half-width of the screen is the distance from the center to the edge)
so θmax = tan-1[(half-width of screen)/L] in each case.
This represents the maximum angle (from the horizontal) that light can leave the slits and still hit the screen. If you put this into the interference maximum formula for double slits, you get:
dsin(θmax) = xλ (with d and λ given)
You can solve this for a value of x, which will probably not be an integer. However, it does represent the dividing line between any bright fringes that hit the screen, and those that do not. The largest integer (m) value less than x represents the number of the last bright fringe that can land on the screen. It is therefore also the number of bright fringes between the center of the screen and the end (discounting the center -- which I often informally call the m=0 -- bright fringe, as the questions instructs). Since this is symmetric on either side of center, double this number to get the total number of bright fringes on the screen.
I think this derivation is correct with the given information. However, I did not quite get your instructor's answers when I did this. I got 12 fringes total for LA and 8 fringes total for LB (not including the center fringe in either case).
I was able to get your instructor's answers if I used the full width of the screen (0.2 m) in the inverse tangent expression above, where I said to use half the width. I think half the width is correct for the definition of the angles in this situation, since it corresponds to the angle away from the optical axis, which goes to the center of the screen. So, if the given information is accurate, I think your instructor may have made small error.
With the given information, I think my results are correct. But if I am mistaken, I apologize.
Just let me know if you have more questions about this!
Olivia B.
08/08/16