For this problem, we know that the vehicle starts and ends at rest, covers 36.4 ft total, and speeds up for part of that time, and slows down for the rest. Using the subscript 1 to indicate the speeding up segment, and 2 to indicate slowing down, let's summarize what we know:
a1 = 5133.33 ft/min2
a2 = -13933.3 ft/min2
vo1 (the initial velocity for speeding up) = v2 (the final velocity for slowing down) = 0
v1 (the final velocity for speeding up) = vo2 (the initial velocity for slowing down)
d1 (the speeding-up distance) + d2 = 36.4 ft
To frame the whole motion, we need to figure out how far it goes while speeding up (solve for d1). We can do that by combining all of the things we know into a couple standard kinematic equations:
v12 = vo12+2a1d1
v22 = vo22+2a2d2
Since v1 = vo2, we can combine these into one equation, and insert all the quantities we know:
v22 = v12+2a2d2 --> v22=vo12+2a1d1+2a2d2 --> 02 = 02+2a1d1+2a2d2 --> a1d1= -a2d2 --> a1d1 = -a2(36.4-d1)
which, putting in values we know, becomes:
5133.33(d1) = -(-13933.3)(36.4-d1) = 13933.3(36.4-d1)
With some algebra, we can solve this equation for d1, the speeding-up distance. I obtained d1 = 26.6 m, making the slowing down distance d2 = 9.8 m.
This means that, for the distance segments listed in the problem, the vehicle is speeding up through the entire first two segments and for over half the final segment. I will label those segments a, b, and c, in the order presented in the question.
Now we can figure out the time for each segment using other kinematic equations. Sanhita already did this for the first two in the same way I will, but I will include them here for completeness.
To solve for ta, we can use:
da = voata + (1/2)a1ta2 --> 6.1 = 0 + (1/2)(5133.33)ta2
which gives ta = 0.049 min
Since we always need to know the initial velocity for any motion to accurately determine other quantities later, we need to solve for vob before moving on. Since va = vob, We can use:
va = vo+a1ta = vob
This gives vob = 0+(5133.33)(0.049) = 251.5 ft/min
Then we can repeat for Segment b (the 6.2-ft segment), where the vehicle is still only speeding up.
db = vobtb+(1/2)a1tb2 --. 6.2 = (251.5)tb+(1/2)(5133.33)tb2
This can be rearranged into a standard quadratic equation in tb. I used the quadratic formula to solve it, and obtain:
tb = 0.02 min (the positive-time solution, as Sanhita pointed out, since our physical time here cannot be negative)
Then, solve for the initial velocity of Segment c = final velocity of Segment b.
vb = vob+a1tb = 251.5 + (5133.33)(0.02) = 354.2 ft/min
Now, in Segment c, the vehicle is slowing down for the last 9.8 ft, which means it is spending the first 24.1 - 9.8 = 14.3 ft speeding up. We can thus determine the time for each of the speeding up and slowing down parts in this segment, and then add those times together to get the total time spent in segment C (using the final speeding up velocity as the initial slowing down velocity).
For Segment c speeding up:
dcu = vocutcu+(1/2)a1tcu2 --> 14.3 = 354.2tcu+(1/2)(5133.33)tcu2
Again, this becomes a quadratic to solve for tcu. When I do that, I get tcu = 0.033 min as the positive-time solution.
Solving for the final speeding up velocity, which is the initial slowing down velocity (vcdo):
vcu = vcuo+a1tcu = vcdo = 354.2+(5133.33)(0.033) = 523.6 ft/min (not exceeding 660 ft/min, so an okay speed)
Then, finally, for the slowing down segment, since we know the final speed vcd = 0, we can use a slightly different kinematic expression to solve for time:
dcd = (1/2)(vcdo+vcd)tcd --> 9.8 = (1/2)(523.6+0)tcd
This gives tcd = 0.037 min.
The total time spent in the last 24.1 ft is thus tcu+tcd = 0.033 + 0.037 = 0.07 min.
I did not recheck all these calculations, so no guarantees about errors. But my results match Sanhita's, as far as they are the same (until Segment c). But the technique should be sound. Just let me know if you have any questions about details or algebra. Hope this helps! And thanks for clearing up the statements of the problem.
Steven W.
In physics, this kind of problem is called kinematics, and we can use kinematic equations to solve it. The key fact about kinematics is that its equations are only valid over a period of constant acceleration. If the acceleration changes, we have to reset the equations to reflect that. So we have to be able to divide the motion up into segments of constant acceleration.
It looks like your problem is set up for that, with the three segments of distance. Often in these problems, each segment will have a different acceleration. But I have tried a couple different possibilities, and I have not gotten results consistent with the given information.
08/05/16