
Sarah W. answered 01/23/16
Tutor
New to Wyzant
I Can Help You With Math!
The reason people use one or the other formula is because they call the first term of the sequence something different.
If you're used to calling the first term of your sequence ao then you're going to use the first equation. If you call the first term of your equation a1 instead, you'll use the second equation. Otherwise there's not really a difference. The d will be the same. Whatever you were calling ao in the first one you will call a1 in the second.
Here's an example:
2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ...
If I call the first term in this sequence ao then I would write the equation
an = 2 + 3n
where 2 is my ao term and d is 3 because I'm adding three to get the the next term. Also, here an is really the n + 1th term of the sequence because I'm starting by calling the first term the 0th.
My formula gives me the an in a sequence that's going
ao, a1, a2, a3, a4, ...
So a1 is actually the second term and a2 is actually the third term, and so on.
The reason you might prefer to use this formula though is that it simplifies the expression you're using to find an.
Let's consider the same sequence again:
2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ...
This time I'm going to call my first term a1.
Notice then that
a2 = 2 + 3 and
a3 = 2 + 3 + 3 and
a4 = 2 + 3 + 3 + 3 and so on.
The formula I would then get for an would have to be
an = 2 + 3(n - 1)
It can't be the same as the first formula because then a1, which I'm saying is the first term, would be 5 instead of 2.
So converting between the two, nothing changes except that you're calling your first term something different and you're multiplying d by n - 1 instead of n.