
Steve C. answered 06/19/15
Steve C. Math & Chemistry Tutoring
Zellex Z.
asked 06/19/15Steve C. answered 06/19/15
Steve C. Math & Chemistry Tutoring
Paul S. answered 06/19/15
Experienced Math and Physics Tutor
I don't think your question is printing quite right. I'm interpreting it as:
f(x) = x^2 + 1
g(x) has no apparent use in this, but it is g(x) = 3 * x + 1. It is given to throw you off and make you doubt yourself, standardized test writers are jerks like that.
Finding 2*f(4) involves plugging the number 4 into f(x) as if it were x:
f(4) = 4^2 + 1
f(4) = 16 + 1
f(4) = 17
Now we can multiply that result by 2:
2 * f(4) = 2 * 17 = 34
Edited: WyzAnt, in all their glorious wisdom, blessings be upon them, saw fit to copy StackExchange's platform without implementing any of the features that would permit me to make this answer beautiful (Markdown and MathJaX). So, I'll make it look like garbage instead. Thanks WyzAnt for an inferior platform.
While I'm here on my soapbox (manually inserting linebreaks) I want to also note that stripping the StackExchange platform of its voting capabilities is completely wrongheaded. Implement the voting, and reputation tracking and let us tutors have something for our effort!!
Paul S.
Yes, g(x) is useless. Standardized test writers are jerks, and they often include information to throw you off track.
06/19/15
Zellex Z.
06/19/15
David W.
06/19/15
Paul S.
What do you mean, by too much information? Should have I answered the question *less* thoroughly?
06/19/15
Michael J.
06/20/15
Paul S.
The fact that WyzAnt bricked a good system is inherently relevant to every user of this site, even if it isn't relevant to this question. We all need to recognize that in their relentless pursuit of profit that we are all being extracted from. In the case of this "Answers" section we tutors are being extracted from without even a whiff of recompense*. The voting and reputation aspects to StackExchange had to be removed from the codebase when they implemented it here, and I am compelled to point that out. Forgive me.06/20/15
Paul S.
Moreover, demonizing the (far removed) test writer is a strategy for developing a sense of common purpose with the student. I am ultimately interested in the success of my students, and giving us a common enemy (in this case College Board) aligns our efforts and makes me their ally. As a tutor I see standardized testing as a pernicious institution that doesn't actually promote understanding of concepts, but rather a regurgitation of specific techniques. Standardized testing ought to be eliminated which is why I'm comfortable criticizing their techniques in a much harsher way than I would criticize the teachers that these students interface with.06/20/15
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Zellex Z.
06/19/15