Explain why the R v.Keegstra, 1990 (S.C.C) is precedent setting

Question

Explain why the R v.Keegstra, 1990 (S.C.C) is precedent-setting

Answer 1

First, let's define the doctrine of precedent. It holds that judges must follow previous judicial decisions. This is the fundamental principle on which judicial decision making is supported to rest.

In this case, Keegstra claimed section 319(2) that his freedom was limited, pursuant to section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. The case was systematically reported by the entire Supreme Court Canada, the rules were developed and expanded. The case carried authority and justified as precedent because it promoted hatred against identifiable groups and inhibited multiculturalism in Canada.