This problem caught my attention a couple of years ago while reading a calculus book ( I don't remember the name of the author) and I copied it down , but I never gave it a second thought until my house went up to flames. I rediscovered it some months ago going over what was left after the fire.
My take is that the the key phrase here is " following the path of steepest descent " .
Therefore the path in question
r (t) = < x(t) , y(t) , z(t) > which must lie on the surface of the ellipsoid 4 x2 + y2 +4 z2 =9
should be such that its projection on the xy-plane
σ (t) = < x(t) , y(t) > will be orthogonal to the level curves of the function z= f(x,y) = !1/2) √( 9-4x2-y2) in
which corresponds to the " northern " half of the ellipsoid, and also σ (t) = < x(t) , y(t) > will such an
orientation opposite of the direction of the gradient of f at every point
But the level curves of the function f is the family of the curves such that 4x2 +y2 = k , k constant. 0≤ k≤9
and they are ellipses. The differential equation whose set of solutions is the above described family of
curves is 8x +2y dy/dx = 0 , or equivalently dy/dx = -4x/y.
Now the family of curves that is orthogonal to the ellipses has differential equation dy/dx = y/4x
which is a separable one and its solution is y4 = x +c and since it must be passing through (1,1) then c= 0.
Hence
r (t) = < x(t) , y(t) , z(t) >= < t , t1/4, (1/2) [ 9- 4t2 -t1/2 ]1/2 , 1 ≤ t


Adam B.
09/17/21
Dayv O.
thanks for great problem and solution. Obviously t will not be able to go past about 1.39 or the square root is imaginary. But when z=0, x= about 1.39 which makes sense.09/16/21