Amos T. answered 07/28/20
10years + Accounting Tutor
Marginal costing system use only variable cost that relates to production to value its inventory whereas the asorption costing techniques uses both variable cost that relates to production.
Marginal production cost per unit
Direct material 22
Direct labor 17
Variable cost 30
Total 69
Asorption cost per unit will always start from where the Marginal cost ends, therefore
Variable cost per unit 69
Overhead Absorption rate (80k/4k) 20
Total 89
Now the marginal costing statement profit for the month of April
Sales (120 x 3500) 420000
cost of sales
Opening inventory (1000 * 69) 69000
Production (4000 * 69) 276000
closing inventory ((1k + 4k - 3.5k) * 69) (103500) 179400
Gross contribution 240600
Variable selling overhead (5% of 420K) (21000)
Net contribution 157500
Fixed expenses:
Fixed production overhead 80000
fixed selling overhead 7000
fixed Administrative overhead 12000
Fixed distribution overhead 6000 105000
Net profit 52500
Now the Asorption costing statement profit for the month of April
Sales (120 x 3500) 420000
Variable cost of sales
Opening inventory (1000 * 89) 89000
Production (4000 * 89) 356000
closing inventory ((1k + 4k - 3.5k) * 89) (108500) 311500
Gross profit 108500
Administration expense:
Variable selling overhead 21000
fixed selling overhead 7000
fixed Administrative overhead 12000
Fixed distribution overhead 6000 46000
Net profit 62500
Reconciliation statement
The difference is showing as a result of the closing and opening inventory elements because under the marginal costing, fixed production overhead is not considered thereby making the closing inventory lesser than the absorption costing techniques. Therefore the opposite will be done to reconcile
Balance as per marginal 52500
Add closing Inventory of OAR (80k/4k) (1500 * 20) 30000
Opening inventory of OAR (80K/4K) (1000 *20) (20000)
Balance as per absorption costing techniques 62500