
Stanton D. answered 01/22/20
Tutor to Pique Your Sciences Interest
Unlike most problems of this type, this one is perhaps easier to solve from the end backwards!
That's because the amounts manipulated decrease going forward through the problem, and therefore you would have to deal with fractional amounts of a variable if you solved it "forwards", but only with integer amounts of a variable if you solve it "backwards".
So, let the variable "x" represent the number of marbles Betsy discards at the end. Then immediately before she discarded, she had (12 + x) marbles.
Next, consider what effect the initial donation had. If the donation was of (1/2) the difference in their initial marbles, then it must have equalized their marble holdings! So, before the final disposal, each had (12 + x) marbles.
Then, since the first donation was of 2x marbles (since the discard was (1/2) of the number donated), Betsy started with (12 + x + 2x) = (12 + 3x) marbles, and Al with (12 + x - 2x) = (12 - x) marbles.
Since Al started with 2 = (12 - x) marbles, x = 10 and Betsy started with (12 + 3*10) = 44 marbles.
But -- in the real world -- why would you want to discard your marbles? Why not instead use all of them to make up an interesting math game? Just sayin'.
-- Cheers, -- Mr. d.


Stanton D.
No David, you are incorrect. The usual interpretation of "(1/2)" as specified in the problem is, exactly (1/2), not a rounded-down approximation, and not (1/(2+/-0.5)). (Sorry, I don't have the "+/-" symbol available here.) Amounts of donated and discarded marbles must be integers, and when Betsy is left with 12 marbles at the end, that is not 12 +/- 0.5 ! Twelve marbles is not a limited-precision measurement of a continuous variable, it's an exact number. It is not customary in "Diophantine Equation" situations to mention this explicitly?01/23/20
David W.
You wrote: "... amounts manipulated decrease going forward through the problem, and therefore you would have to deal with fractional amounts of a variable if you solved it "forwards", but only with integer amounts of a variable if you solve it "backwards". FACTS: If Betsy discards "x" marbles at the end, then then the number of donated marbles is either 2x or else 2x+1. Working the problem "backwards" allowed you to ignore this.01/23/20