Asked • 08/02/19

Why don't we consider jerk in physics classes?

When I got more into physics, I started asking myself if just like acceleration represents the growth of speed, something else could also represent the growth of acceleration itself. And it came that is exists and is called _jerk_. Before I thought about this, I thought that acceleration was the highest derivative that made sense on physics. My question is, why can we perform accurate calculations without account for _jerk_? I never needed it in a single physics class! I've also read that it is seldom used. Also, while position, speed and acceleration seem familiar to me due to everyday experience, why doesn't _jerk_ seem familiar to me? I never tell someone when driving a car "you're jerking too much", whereas I could say "you are accelerating too much". Is it that jerk has little influence because it is almost constant? Even if it is not, what about higher order derivatives? Why don't derivatives higher than acceleration have much influence on calculations? We perform a lot of reasoning in everyday life without resorting to it!

2 Answers By Expert Tutors

By:

Rick R. answered • 08/02/19

Tutor
5.0 (508)

Electrical engineering specialist, MSEE degree, EE practitioner

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.