Ira S. answered 12/12/14
Tutor
5.0
(298)
Bilingual math tutor and much more
The basic principal of induction says....prove it that 1 works, assume it works for k and then prove that it works for k+1.
The reasoning behind induction is as follows. If you showed the things above, then if it works for 1, you proved that it works for 2 since 2 is 1 more than 1. And if it works for 2, then it works for 2+1 or 3....and if it works for 3, then it works for 3+1 or 4......and so on for all integers. You do have to show the first one works and then prove that 1 more than the previous term works so you can build this recursive situation.
Now to your particular situation:
1
∑ 4n+1 = 1 + 5 = 6 using the formula you get (1+1)(2*1+1) = 2*3 = 6 so this works for n=1
n=0
Assume
k
∑ 4n+1 = (k+1)(2k+1)
n=0
PROVE
k+1
∑ 4n+1 = (k+1 +1)(2(k+1) +1) = (k+2)(2k+3)
n=0
So,
1+5+9+.....(4k+1) + [4(k+1) +1] is what the summation symbol of what we want to prove means. We can now take what we assumed and replace all but the last term with our assumption to get....
k
∑ 4n+1 + [4(k+1)+1] which is (k+1)(2k+1) + [4k+5]
n=0
That's 2k2+3k+1 +4k+5 or
2k2+7k+6 which factors into
(k+2)(2k+3).
When you plug k+1 into the formula you're trying to prove you get (k+1+1)(2(k+1)+1) = the same thing.
So you're done.
Hope this makes some sense to you.