Albert G.
asked 01/29/18Evaluate an infinite staircase of square roots of square roots plus square roots .
This is an expression involving a concatenation of overlapping square roots of square roots,
x = √16¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
+ √16¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
+ √16¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
+ √16¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
+ etc., whereby all radicals encompass ALL subsequent radicands (which are themselves radicals) for any number of iterations N. I want to be evaluate the limit as N approaches ∞.
More
1 Expert Answer

Bobosharif S. answered 01/29/18
Tutor
4.4
(32)
Mathematics/Statistics Tutor
There are several way to find that limit. One of them is as following:
xn=√16+√16+..=√16+xn-1
xn=√(16+xn-1) (LIM)
Now, if there exists (!) Limx→∞xn =a, Then Limx→∞xn-1 =a as well
Now taking limit from both sides of (LIM) gives you
a=√(16+a)
a2=16+a
a2-a-16=0
If you solve this quadratic equation, you get
a1=(1/2) (1 -√65), a2=(1/2) (1 + √65).
So,
Limx→∞xn =(1/2) (1 + √65). (I guess, you know why not not a1).
Note: When finding the limit this way, somehow you have to show that it exists and and bounded. In principal, you have to clarify that in the first place.
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Ask a question for free
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Find an Online Tutor Now
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Albert G.
01/30/18