We first combine fractions, rationalize the numerator, and then compare to the function with the x^2 dropped out instead of dropping out the x's in the denominator. This is because x goes to zero slower than x^2 in the case of a limit at 0, so it gives us a better chance at getting to 0:
x2/[ √x√(x2+x) (√(x2+x) + √x) ] < (√x)/2 by the fact that √(x2+x) > √x
and the expression on the right goes to zero as x goes to 0+. By the squeeze theorem, so does the original expression, using the fact that it is squeezed on the left side by the constant 0 function (everything is positive; we can see that in the original expression, or after we rationalize).
Or:
Switching it to a limit at (positive) infinity, the following limit is equivalent
limx→∞√x - x/√(x+1) replaced each x with 1/x, then combined the fraction in the radical in the right denominator
(√x√(x+1) - x)/√(x+1) combined fractions
= x/[√(x+1) * (√x√(x+1) + x)] rationalized the numerator by multiplying top and bottom by the conjugate of the numerator
< x/[ √x(√x√x + x) ] because √x < √(x+1), and a smaller denominator makes the overall fraction larger, for positive fractions
= 1/[ 2√x ] by algebra
which goes to 0 as x goes to infinity.
By the squeeze theorem (using the fact that we can squeeze on the left by the constant 0 function: the function is always positive as x goes to infinity) the limit is zero.
That connects it to an earlier problem.