Roman C. answered 06/08/16
Tutor
5.0
(851)
Masters of Education Graduate with Mathematics Expertise
1. I think you may have a typo, 256 is a power of 2, but 254 is not.
log2 64 + (log3 27) log4(1/256)
= log2 26 + (log3 33) log4 4-4
= 6 + (3)(-4)
= 6 - 12
= -6
2.
2 log4 (x+4) - log4 (x+12) = 1
log4 (x+4)2 - log4 (x+12) = 1
log4 [(x+4)2/(x+12)] = 1
(x+4)2/(x+12) = 4
(x+4)2 = 4(x+12)
x2 + 8x + 16 = 4x + 48
x2 + 4x - 32 = 0
(x - 4)(x + 8) = 0
x = 4 or x = -8
We can throw out x = -8 since one logarithm in the equation would be log4 -4, which is undefined. The other choice x = 4, is okay.
2 log4 (x+4) - log4 (x+12)
= 2 log4 (4+4) - log4 (4+12)
= 2 log4 8 - log4 16
= log4 64 - log4 16
= log4 (64/16)
= log4 4
= 1
3. You probably meant to put parentheses around x-3.
3√(2562) 16x = 64x-3
2562 (16x)3 = (64x-3)3
(44)2 ((42)x)3= ((43)x-3)3
48 46x = 49(x-3)
46x+8 = 49(x-3)
9(x - 3) = 6x + 8
9x - 27 = 6x + 8
3x = 35
x = 35/3
Check:
LHS: 3√(2562) 1635/3 = 2562/3 1635/3 = 48/3 470/3 = 478/3 = 426
RHS: 6435/3 - 3 = 64(35-9)/3= 6426/3 = 478/3 = 426
They match so x = 35/3 works.
4. As written it is
3x = 9(x^2 - 1/2)
Usually solutions can't be given in closed form when some occurrences of x are in exponents and some are not. However, by inspection, x = 1 is a solution.
The other solution, x = 0.114349699058706... has no closed form.