Linda L.
asked 11/04/15Please help with this related rates calc problem!
1 Expert Answer
Dayaan M. answered 09/10/26
Web Developer Teaching jQuery and JavaScript, 5.0 Rated
This is a second-derivative related rates problem, which is what makes it harder than the usual version. Differentiating the volume formula once only gets you halfway — you have to differentiate again, and that is where a product rule appears and creates a term people routinely drop.
Reading the given quantities as rates of change of volume: dV/dt = −729π in3/min and d2V/dt2 = −324π in3/min2.
Step 1: write V in terms of h alone
This step is what makes the rest work. The tank has top radius 20 (diameter 40) and height 90, so by similar triangles the water surface satisfies
r/h = 20/90 = 2/9, so r = 2h/9
Substituting into V = (1/3)πr2h:
V = (1/3)π(2h/9)2h = (4π/243)h3
Do this substitution before differentiating. If you differentiate with r still in the formula you pick up a dr/dt term you do not want.
Step 2: first derivative gives dh/dt
dV/dt = (4π/243)(3h2)(dh/dt) = (4π/81)h2(dh/dt)
At h = 18 we have h2 = 324, and (4π/81)(324) = 16π, so
−729π = 16π(dh/dt) → dh/dt = −729/16 = −45.5625 in/min
You need this number before you can finish, which is exactly why the problem cannot be done in a single differentiation.
Step 3: differentiate again — the product rule step
Differentiate dV/dt = (4π/81)h2(dh/dt) with respect to t. The right side is a product of h2 and dh/dt, and both depend on t:
d2V/dt2 = (4π/81)[ 2h(dh/dt)2 + h2(d2h/dt2) ]
That first term, 2h(dh/dt)2, is the one that gets forgotten. It is not optional — the water level is speeding up partly because the tank narrows as it drains, and that term is precisely that effect.
Step 4: plug in and solve
With h = 18 and dh/dt = −729/16:
2h(dh/dt)2 = 2(18)(729/16)2 = 36 · 531441/256 = 4782969/64
So −324π = (4π/81)[ 4782969/64 + 324(d2h/dt2) ]
Cancel π and multiply both sides by 81/4:
−6561 = 4782969/64 + 324(d2h/dt2)
324(d2h/dt2) = −6561 − 4782969/64 = −5202873/64
d2h/dt2 = −64233/256 ≈ −250.91 in/min2
Does the answer make sense?
Worth a sanity check, since the number is large. The depth is falling (dh/dt < 0) and the second derivative is also negative, so the depth is falling faster and faster. That is exactly right for a cone draining point-down: as the water drops, the cross-section shrinks, so the same loss of volume drops the level further. The acceleration should be negative, and it is.
I also checked this numerically before posting — modeling V(t) with the given first and second derivatives and taking a central difference of h(t) gives −250.9102, matching the exact value.
The pattern to carry forward
Whenever a related rates problem asks about acceleration rather than velocity, expect this shape: differentiate once, solve for the first rate, then differentiate that equation again and substitute. And every time you differentiate a product of two changing quantities, write out both product-rule terms explicitly before plugging numbers in. Dropping the 2h(dh/dt)2 term is the single most common way this problem gets missed.
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Inactive Tutor
should the velocity and acceleration units be in^3/min?09/05/26