Jon P. answered 08/24/15
Tutor
5.0
(173)
Knowledgeable Math, Science, SAT, ACT tutor - Harvard honors grad
I think you have to assume that a, b, and c are all ≥ 0 for this to be true. For example, suppose a = -1, b = -1, c = 1. Then...
(a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca) = [-1 -1 +1] [(-1)(-1) + (-1)(1) + (1)(-1)] =
(-1)(1 - 1 - 1) = (-1)(-1) = 1
But 9abc = 9(-1)(-1)(1) = 9.
So in that case, the statement is not true. So let's assume that all the numbers are ≥ 0, and that you just left this out of the statement.
Let's calculate (a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca) - 9abc. If that is ≥ 0, then that proves the statement.
(a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca) - 9abc =
(a2b + abc + a2c) + (ab2 + b2c + abc) + (abc + bc2 + ac2) - 9abc =
a2b + a2c + ab2 + b2c + bc2 + ac2 + 3abc - 9abc =
a2b + a2c + ab2 + b2c + bc2 + ac2 - 6abc
There are 6 terms that include a square, so lets split up the -6abc among them. We get:
(a2b - abc) + (a2c - abc) + (ab2 - abc) + (b2c - abc) + (bc2 - abc) + (ac2 - abc)
Factor each of the terms in parentheses:
ab (a-c) + ac (a-b) + ab (b-c) + bc (b-a) + bc (c-a) + ac(c-b)
Rearrange:
ab (a-c) + bc (c-a) + ac (a-b) + bc (b-a) + ab (b-c) + ac(c-b) =
ab (a-c) - bc (a-c) + ac (a-b) - bc (a-b) + ab (b-c) - ac(b-c)
Factor each group of two:
b (a-c)(a-c) + c (a-b)(a-b) + a (b-c)(b-c) =
b (a-c)2 + c (a-b)2 + a (b-c)2
Now, the square terms are all ≥ 0, and a, b, and c, are all ≥ 0. That means that the 3 terms in the last expression are all ≥ 0. So the entire expression is ≥ 0.
Going back to the beginning, that means that
(a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca) - 9abc ≥ 0
So...
(a + b + c)(ab + bc + ca) ≥ 9abc
And that proves the statement.