sometimes trying out a few possibilities helps see where the sequence is going
or graph it with a graphing calculator
but if this is posted as a "calculus" problem skip ahead to the last couple paragraphs, which almost incomprehensible, may be exactly what you are looking for
meanwhile, try some n's, 1,2,3, ...11,12, 100
sum n^9/9^2 from n= integers from 1 to infinity
n= 1, 1^9/9^1 = 1/9 = .111...=about .11
n=2, 2^9/9^2 = 512/81= about 6.32
n=3, 3^9/9^3 = 3^2(3^2)(3^2)(3^2)(3)/3^2(3^2)(3^2) = 27
looks at first like it grows exponentially and diverges to infinity
but wait:
n=4 = 4^9/9^4 =about 39.95
maybe not, its growth is slowing down
and
n=5 = 5^9/9^5 = 33.08. it's slowing down, likely converges after all
n=6 =about 18.96
n=7 = about 8.44
n=8 = about 3.12
n=9, 9^9/9^9 = 1 definitely slowing down
n=10, 10^9/9^10 = about .29 seems to converge to 0
n=11, 11^9/9^11 = about .08
n=12, = about .02
...
n=100 100^9/9^100 = about 3.8 x 10^-78 = very close to zero, a decimal point then 77 zeros before 38
the sequence definitely converges to zero
the series converges to a sum less than at most 200 or so, add up 1/9, 6.32, 27, ... .02, above
use a graphing calculator, such as handheld TI83 calculator or online desmos
maximum value is about 40
then quickly converges to 0
the sequence clearly converges
or you can do a ratio test, integral test, l'hopital's rule, but
graph y=x^9/9^x, that's probably the most simple, fastest way to see it converges
sum = .11+6.32+27+39.95+33.08+18.96+8.44+3.12+1+.29+.08+.02
= about 139.31
the series converges to about 139.31
= about 139
actually 138.3666948 is more accurate
=about 138. the above calculation summing .11 through .02 involves rounding to 2 decimals, throwing the sum off a little
in general, if a>0, b>1, then lim n^a/b^n = 0
for 9^n/n^9 n from 1 to infinity, a=b>0, so the sequence converges
the integral test, although very tedious, involving integration by parts, is interesting
integral of n^9/9^n dn
= a constant = about 138.3487296, therefore, the series converges
the integral = exactly (4ln^9(3) + 18ln^8(3) + 72ln^7(3)+252ln^6(3)+756ln^5(3)+1890ln^4(3)+3780ln^3(3)_5670ln^2(3)+5670ln(3)+2835)/72ln^10(3)
BUT this may be the method you want, as you listed this problem under "Calculus" and this is Integral calculus to the hilt. If you were required to solve this problem with calculus, this is the method you want most.
and although the convergence is to about 138, it's slightly different for the decimals. but the close nearly identical answers are a good check, on the answer.