Andrew T. answered 07/13/24
PhD with extensive teaching experience in STEM subjects
Sure! Here’s the explanation using ordinary text for all mathematical symbols:
Given Information
You have a 3x3 real matrix A with the following properties:
- The trace of A is the sum of its eigenvalues:
tr(A) = lambda_1 * m_1 + lambda_2 * m_2 = -4
- The determinant of A is the product of its eigenvalues:
det(A) = lambda_1^m_1 * lambda_2^m_2 = -32
Eigenvalue Conditions
Since A is a 3x3 matrix, the algebraic multiplicities must satisfy:
m_1 + m_2 = 3
With only two distinct eigenvalues, the possible pairs for (m_1, m_2) are:
- (2, 1)
- (1, 2)
Exploring the Cases
Case 1: m_1 = 2 and m_2 = 1
In this scenario:
- lambda_1 has a multiplicity of 2
- lambda_2 has a multiplicity of 1
The equations become:
1. 2 * lambda_1 + lambda_2 = -4
2. lambda_1^2 * lambda_2 = -32
From the first equation, express lambda_2 in terms of lambda_1:
lambda_2 = -4 - 2 * lambda_1
Substituting this into the second equation gives:
lambda_1^2 * (-4 - 2 * lambda_1) = -32
This simplifies to:
-4 * lambda_1^2 - 2 * lambda_1^3 = -32
Multiplying through by -1:
2 * lambda_1^3 + 4 * lambda_1^2 - 32 = 0
Dividing by 2:
lambda_1^3 + 2 * lambda_1^2 - 16 = 0
Testing for rational roots, we find:
When lambda_1 = 2:
2^3 + 2 * (2^2) - 16 = 0
Thus, lambda_1 = 2 is a root. Factoring gives:
(lambda_1 - 2)(lambda_1^2 + 4 * lambda_1 + 8) = 0
The quadratic lambda_1^2 + 4 * lambda_1 + 8 has a negative discriminant, indicating complex eigenvalues.
Case 2: m_1 = 1 and m_2 = 2
Now, we have:
- lambda_1 has a multiplicity of 1
- lambda_2 has a multiplicity of 2
The equations become:
1. lambda_1 + 2 * lambda_2 = -4
2. lambda_1 * lambda_2^2 = -32
From the first equation, express lambda_1 in terms of lambda_2:
lambda_1 = -4 - 2 * lambda_2
Substituting this into the second equation yields:
(-4 - 2 * lambda_2) * lambda_2^2 = -32
This simplifies to:
-4 * lambda_2^2 - 2 * lambda_2^3 = -32
Multiplying through by -1:
2 * lambda_2^3 + 4 * lambda_2^2 - 32 = 0
Dividing by 2:
lambda_2^3 + 2 * lambda_2^2 - 16 = 0
Testing for rational roots again, we find:
When lambda_2 = 2:
2^3 + 2 * (2^2) - 16 = 0
Thus, lambda_2 = 2 works. Factoring gives:
(lambda_2 - 2)(lambda_2^2 + 4 * lambda_2 + 8) = 0
Again, the quadratic lambda_2^2 + 4 * lambda_2 + 8 has a negative discriminant.
Finding a Valid Set
After testing various combinations, we can find:
Let lambda_1 = -2 and check:
- If lambda_2 = -4 - 2 * (-2) leads to impossible eigenvalues, we need to explore other combinations.
Final Eigenvalues
After exploration, we conclude:
- lambda_1 = -2 (multiplicity 1)
- lambda_2 = -2 (multiplicity 2)
Best,
Andrew