
David B. answered 05/21/23
Math and Statistics need not be scary
a) This is the wrong venue for asking questions which demand graphics. I can not graph a normal distribution with an Xbar of 24 and a σXbar of 0.5477 into this answer. You can get a graphic of the distribution at this location using μ=24 and σ = 0.5477 (htps://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~mbognar/applets/normal.html)
b)Poorly written questions. There is no sample mean given, only a population mean. Assuming the question being asked is actually "Assuming that there is no trend in annual rainfall and a random sample of size 30 is taken from some unspecified population of yearly measurements and that the yearly measurements are normally distributed with a variance equal to 9 inches, what is the probability that a random sample of size 30 will have a value equal to the given population mean of 24, plus or minus 1 (23 to 25)? Well, using a μ of 24 and a σXbar of 0.5477 i.e.(9/30).5 . Using the CDF φ(P 23 < X < 25) we get an answer of .9321. for the record, the same answer can be gotten from a Z table showing cumulative probabilities less than or equal to the z score by getting p value for a z score of -1/.5477, multiplying it by two and subtracting that from 1.
c)This one is even weirder. What sample mean? The one for California, the one for New York If from NY, and we make the same assumptions as in b, only for NY, the answer is calculated the same, only with a standard deviation of the mean (σXbar ) being (9/45).5 or 0.4472. and the resulting probability would be .9747
d) Making comparisons using the standard error or standard deviation of the mean of a random sample will always result in a tighter (smaller) confidence interval for larger sample size as the standard deviation of the mean gets smaller as the sample size gets larger.
The probability of being within 1 inch is greater for New York in part (c) because the sample size is larger