Start with the law of demand: as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity demanded will decrease and vice versa.
If a price decreases, the income effect will be positive because it makes the consumer feel like they have more money. If the price increases, the income effect will be negative.
This tells you that options A, B & C all involve a price increase, while option D involves a price reduction.
With a price decrease, you would expect to see an increase in quantity demanded, which means that the sum of the substitution and income effects should be positive, or at the very least, not negative. So for option D you would expect to see an increase in the quantity demanded, which you do (-2 + 3 > 0). Thus option D aligns with the law of demand.
You would expect to see the opposite for a price increase.
Option C results in a large reduction of quantity demanded, and thus aligns with the law of demand.
Option A results in no change in quantity demanded, but that also aligns with the law of demand (barely).
Option B, however, results in an increase in quantity demanded despite the increase in price. This does not align with the law of demand.
Therefore, the best answer to this question is option B.
Footnote: option B is exhibiting something called "Giffen behavior" and you would want to look up Giffen goods if you want to know more about this behavior.
