
Dayv O. answered 08/07/21
Caring Super Enthusiastic Knowledgeable Calculus Tutor
isn't 1+3n <4n for n>1
so the limit is less than 4
Dayv O. answered 08/07/21
Caring Super Enthusiastic Knowledgeable Calculus Tutor
isn't 1+3n <4n for n>1
so the limit is less than 4
Dayv is, of course, correct.
And since 3n<3n+1, you have 3<(3n+1)1/n<4.
This tells you that the sequence converges, but does not give you the limit.
The so-called Squeeze Theorem is usually used to prove the limit...which means better estimates need to used to apply that theorem.
Right away, I don't see a way to get a better estimate for the upper bound.
OK, try this.
xn = 3(1+3-n)1/n
The first three terms of the binomial are 3[1 + (1/n)3-n - n(n-1)3--2n/2n2...
This is an alternating sign series so the the error does not exceed in absolute value the first omitted term.
This gives you the upper and lower bound you need for the so-called Squeeze Theorem and shows that the limit is, in fact, 3.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.