For comparison, establish ∫(from 0 to 1)[ln x]dx:
u = ln x-----------dv = dx
du = dx/x----------v = x
Guide on ∫[u]dv = uv − ∫[v]du or
------------∫[ln x]dx = x[ln x] − ∫[x](dx/x).
Rewrite this last as ∫[ln x]dx = x[ln x] − ∫dx or
∫[ln x] dx = x[ln x] − x + Constant.
Evaluate {x[ln x] − x + Constant|(from 0 to 1)}:
{1[ln 1] − 1 + Constant} minus {0[ln 0] − 0 + Constant}
goes to 1× 0 − 1 + Constant minus 0 × lim(x→0+) [ln x] + 0 − Constant.
Reduce the last expression above to -1. Note that lim(x→0+) [ln x] is -∞.
**************************************************************************************
The series 1 + x + x2 + ... + xn + ... = 1/(1 − x) can be rewritten with -x in place
of x to obtain 1 − x + x2 − x3 + ... + (-1)nxn + ... = 1/(1 + x). (Both series require |x| < 1.)
The second series can be integrated term-by-term to gain x − x2/2 + x3/3 − x4/4 + ... +
(-1)nx(n+1)/(n + 1) [for -1 < x ≤ 1], which will converge to ln (1 + x).
For x = -0.01, ln (1 + x) is ln 0.99; for x = -0.99, ln (1 + x) is ln 0.01. A loop program on
a calculator gives ln 0.99 to exact value in the summation of the first five terms as
-0.01005033585.
For ln 0.01, however, the program takes 1850 loops to give exact value as -4.605170186.
Then {0.99 × ln 0.99 − 0.99} minus {0.01 × ln 0.01 − 0.01} simplifies to -0.9438981306,
fairly comparable to -1 above.