
Cannon W. answered 04/01/21
Masters in Applied Math With 20+ Years Teaching Experience
This might not fully answer your question, but maybe we can clear things up a little bit.
First, you're exactly right. The derivative is the slope at a single point (slope of the tangent line) and the integral is area under a curve. On the surface those seem like completely unrelated processes.
That's what makes the Fundamental Theorem so special. It says that integration is actually just derivatives in reverse. (That may not be the most technically correct explanation, but it gets to the heart of the matter).
Without the Fundamental Theorem, we would have to calculate area under a curve using limits and Riemann Sums (as you allude to in your question). The Fundamental Theorem says we can accomplish the same thing using anti-derivatives.
What is an anti-derivative? It's an UN-derivative, the derivative in reverse. For example, the derivative of x2 is 2x, so the anti-derivative of 2x is x2. *(It's actually x2 + C, but I'll explain that below.) The derivative of 4x5 is 20x4 so the anti-derivative of 20x4 is 4x5 *(again, see footnote below). It's often worded this way: Given f(x), the anti-derivative is the function F(x) such that F'(x) = f(x).
Back to the Fundamental Theorem, it says that if you want to find the area under f(x) between points a and b, instead of using a Riemann Sum, you can find F(x) -- the anti-derivative of f(x) -- and then calculate F(b) - F(a).
For example, let's find the area under f(x)=x2 between x=1 and x=2. The anti-derivative of x^2 is *F(x) = 1⁄3x3 (because the derivative of 1⁄3x3 is x2 -- just do your power rule in reverse) F(2) = 8⁄3 and F(1) = 1⁄3. The area under f(x)=x2 between x=1 and x=2 is F(2) - F(1) = 7⁄3.
So taking the integral of the derivative (or the derivative of the integral) is sort of like squaring a number and then taking the square root. They are opposite processes that essentially undo each other.
*Now for the nitty-gritty stuff we ignored earlier. As you know, the derivative of a constant is zero (by its very definition, a constant has no rate of change). So the derivative of x2 is 2x, but so is the derivative of x2 +3 or x2 -7. So if you're given 2x and asked to find its anti-derivative, it could be x2 or x2 +3 or x2 -7 or x2±[any constant]. So to cover our bases, we say the anti-derivative is x2 + C (where C represents any constant). We can essentially ignore that C when doing "definite integrals" (integrals with upper and lower limits where we're finding a specific area because the C's will cancel out when we subtract F(a) from F(b).

Cannon W.
Let's try this. You're correct, that the way we typically find area under a curve is by summing up thin rectangles (Riemann Sums); but let's look at your specific example. If we have the function y=2x, that's a line through the origin with a slope of 2, it goes through the points (0,0),(1,2), (2,4), (3,6), . . . , (x,2x). So if we're trying to find the area under y=2x from 0 to some point 'x', that area is a triangle. At any point along the positive x-axis, the base of the triangle is x, and the height of the triangle is 2x. Since it's a simple geometric shape, we can find the area directly rather than resorting to Riemann Sums. The area of a triangle is 1/2*b*h. In this example, 1/2*x*2x -- and that equals x^2.04/05/21
Rahul A.
thank you04/20/21
Rahul A.
when we integrate a derivative function for eg 2x(which is derivative of x^2) we are adding up or summing up the thin rectangles under the derivative function 2x i.e we find the area under the function 2x. Right? after integrating we get the original function,x^2 right?? so the area under the curve 2x is equal to x^2 right?why is it so?? i mean why area under the derivative function 2x is equal to the function x^2. how is the area under the curve of 2x equal to x^2?04/03/21