Patrick B. answered 03/30/21
Math and computer tutor/teacher
Well the numerator factors as (x + 3)(x - 2)....
which cancels the denominator....
which kills the removable discontinuity...
It remains to prove the limit of x+3 tends to 5 as x tends to 2.
----------------------------------------------
The "precise" rigorous classic definition:
For every e > 0 there exists d>0 such that
L - e < f(x) < L + e when t-d < x < t+d
and d is a function of e.
Here L=5 and t-2 for function f(x)=x+3
Working backwards:
5 - e < x+3 < 5 + e
2-e < x < 2+e
This suggests we let d=e>0
Then when
2-e < x < 2+e
It MUST follow that
5-e < x+3=f(x) < 5+e
Therefore the function is contained in
the neighborhood of 5 when x is in the
neighborhood of 2.
[end of proof]