Makayla S.

asked • 02/12/21

Evaluate the Limit

How do you evaluate the limit...


lim t-->inf (square root t2+at+b - (t-c))


The square root is over t2+at+b

2 Answers By Expert Tutors

By:

Yefim S. answered • 02/13/21

Tutor
5 (20)

Math Tutor with Experience

William W. answered • 02/12/21

Tutor
4.9 (1,021)

Experienced Tutor and Retired Engineer

Kevin S.

tutor
Neat approach I haven't seen before. Is there a calc-1-friendly rigorous justification for "insignificant"? Simplest I can think of is squeeze theorem.
Report

02/12/21

William W.

I'm an engineer so "rigorous" has less meaning to me than "practical". It is easy to see (seems trivial) that, since numbers get huge as one goes toward infinity, that "a" and "b" (whatever their values) will be completely overshadowed by the value of "x". If someone says "then I'll pick huge values for 'a' and 'b' ", I'll just respond with "then I'll pick a value of "x" that's a million times bigger than your 'a' and/or 'b' ".
Report

02/12/21

Kevin S.

tutor
I understand the approach; that's not what I asked. But now that you've said that, how do you know not to also throw out the other a/2 and the -c and just get 0? The question is not rhetorical; I don't know the answer.
Report

02/13/21

William W.

The square root of (t + a/2)^2 + b - (a/2)^2 approaches the square root of (t + a/2)^2 as t approaches infinity. So now that we have simplified the problem to the square root of (t + a/2)^2, we can take the square root and simplify. That's it, nothing more. I understand if you'd like to take the more "rigorous" approach.
Report

02/13/21

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.