Michael K. answered 02/09/21
PhD professional for Math, Physics, and CS Tutoring and Martial Arts
Given that f(x) = -ln(x) for 0 < x ≤ 1, we know that ln(0) = -∞, so -ln(0) = ∞, and ln(1) = 0
The area of this function with respect the x-axis can be written as
int_{lb=0}_{ub}=1 (-ln(x))dx
But, the lower bound as we noted above is undefined (∞). So we cannot use zero as the lower bound, but can use any other number (however close to 0, but not zero) that we wish in order to have a finite area...
int_{lb=ε}_{ub}=1 (-ln(x))dx where ε > 0
So since x much be strictly > , the region would have a finite area
--------------
Revolving this region about the y-axis is akin to calculating the annuli of the function (cylinders with holes in the middle) sometimes called the "cylindrical shell method". Area = 2*π*r*h. We just need to figure out r and h
Volume = int_{lb=ε}_{ub=1} (2*π*(x)*(-ln(x))dx
This can be done via integration by parts and yields...
Volume = -2*π* (x2ln(x)/2 - x2/4) evaluated at the bounds...
Volume = -2*π* ( [(12*0 )/ 2 - 12/4] - [ε2ln(ε)/2 - ε2/4] )
Volume = -2*π* (-1/4 + ε2/4 - ε2ln(ε))
Volume = 2*π*( (1-ε2)/4 + ε2ln(ε) )
In the limit as epsilon goes to zero (lim ε --> 0), the volume becomes π/2
----------------
Arc Length as shown in the problem relates to the derivate of the function...
f(x) = -ln(x)
f'(x) = -1/x
L = int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=1} (sqrt(1 + 1/x2))dx
L = int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=1} ( sqrt(x2/(1 + x2)) ) dx = int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=1} ( x * sqrt(1/(1 + x2)) ) dx
L = sqrt(1 + x2) from 0.5 to 1
L = sqrt(1 + 12) - sqrt(1+ 0.52) = sqrt(2) - sqrt(5)/2
---------------------
Now we need to know where the intersection of the g(x) and f(x) resides for our integral to compute the area between the curves. Solving the transcendental equation (use desmos to plot both f(x) and g(x)) gives the intersection of these curves at approximately 0.653 in x. Let's call this R
Therefore, we use the additivity law for integrals...
int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=1} = int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=R} + int_{lb=R}_{ub=1}
Since g(x) < f(x) for x < R and g(x) > f(x) for x > R we have...
int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=R} (f(x) - g(x))dx + int_{lb=R}_{ub=1} (g(x) - f(x))dx
The first integral --> int_{lb=0.5}_{ub=R} (-ln(x) - x^2)dx = -xln(x) - x - x3/3 eval from 0.5 to R
= -Rln(R) - R - R3/3 - ln(2)/2 + 0.5 + (0.5)3/3
= -Rln(R) - R - R3/3 + (1 - ln(2))/2 + 1/24
The second integral --> int_{lb=R}_{ub=1} (g(x) - f(x))dx = x3/3 + xlnx + x eval from R to 1
= 1/3 + 1* 0 + 1 - R3/3 - Rln(R) - R
= 4/3 - R3/3 - Rln(R) - R
Adding them together yields --> 4/3 + 1/24 + (1-ln(2))/2 - 2*(R3/3 + Rln(R) + R)
Now plug in the value of R from above and approximate your response to 3 decimal places
-----------