Do you agree with civilian payouts for police brutality ? Why or why not. Where should the money come from and how can the payouts be handled differently?

Answer 1

They should adopt a system similar to workers comp. You get injured at work, you don't sue the employer, instead you get compensation. Do the same with police.

Instead, our supreme court, in it's unique wisdom, contrary to any government on earth ever, has its "exclusionary rule" which protects the guilty and gives nothing to the innocent victims of police illegal search & seizures But the Supremes were right, as there was no workable alternative, given our court system. Yet it did say that's the only reason they adopted the exclusionary rule, as it was too difficult to sue police. But that's precisely what our founding fathers considered the real remedy: sue the police.

The Supremes could have declared unconstitutional court remedies that made it too expensive to sue police, but instead they went with protecting criminals and "punishing" police by excluding illegal evidence. Police just considered that a badge of honor, not a "punishment" so they lie more to sneak the illegal evidence into court.