Reza F. answered 09/16/20
Physics, Math (AP, HS, Colledge) , and Electrical Engineering Tutor
k is the average number of events in the unit of time and is called rate parameter. Let's say we take month as the unit of time, thus, k is the number of events per month. With the average of one even each three month k is 1/3. Therefore, the probability distribition function f(x) is:
f(x) = 0 for x<0
f(x) = (1/3)*e^(-x/3) for x>0
now, if we assume no changes happened after fixing the traffic lights, the probability of having at least one event after 8 month is the integral of f(x) from 0 to 8 which gives
integral (1/3)*e^(-x/3) from 0 to 8 = -e^(-8/3) + e^(0/3) = 1-e^(-8/3)
But we want the probability of no event which is the complementry of the above, so
Probability of no event = 1 - (1-e^(-8/3)) = e^(-8/3) = 0.069
Or about 7%. Therefore there is a 7% change that nothing changed after they fixed the traffic lights. We usually want to get to less than 1% to be sure. So, if you ask me, you should wait longer to see if the traffic lights fixes had any impact.
Alan J.
I have a question though. According to 1(b) were the changes effective? Because i did not understand the line 'We usually want to get to less than 1% to be sure'09/17/20
Alan J.
Were the changes effective?09/17/20

Reza F.
09/17/20
Alan J.
Yes this question is a bit based on conditions. Thank you again. Your explanations helped me so much.09/17/20
Scott P.
Hmm. The problem states that k is the average time between events, not the average number of events per unit time, so I would take k to be 3 in part (a).09/19/20
Alan J.
I have another question. Why is k 'the average number of events in the unit of time'? as in the question 'the average time between events is k'. Its a little confusing and I had to ask. I know that rate parameter is the most likely number of events but in the question it says k is the average time...09/19/20
Alan J.
Will the value of k be changed to 3 if k is considered average time, not average no. of events? I would like to know please09/19/20
Alan J.
Could you give feedback on this please?09/19/20
Alan J.
Thank you very much. I was not quite sure how I would answer it. But at first glance, you made it clear enough. I appreciate it.09/17/20