Erika B. answered  12/16/19
State University Instructor Specializing in Econ & Stats
A Nash Equilibrium is Pareto Optimal if neither player can be made better off without making the other worse off.
For example, if the Nash Equilibrium of a game involves payoffs (0,0) but there is another node with payoffs (1,-20), then (0,0) is Pareto Optimal, because even though I may improve my own outcome by getting 1 instead of 0, you then must lose utility.
 
         
     
             
                     
                     
                    
Lenny D.
This doesn't show the Edgeworth Box and the parade O optimal allocation where the marginal rates of substitution between both agents are tangent12/16/19