Hi Lindsay.
A couple of comments.
a) You've correctly calculated the Z and looked it up. I would have selected 0.3483 rather than .0.3850 since -0.3897 is so close to -0.39 rather than -0.38. But this is hardly significant. What is more important is the value you looked up is the probability that z<-0.3897, not greater than. To get the probability that the weight is > 167 #, we need to subtract the answer from the table from 1.00
So, using your value,
1.0000-0.3520 = .6480 or 64.8%
Using my value
1.0000 - 0.3483 = .6517 or 65.17%
b) Again you've set this up correctly and adjusted the standard deviation for the number of participants selected, but remember the z table gives us the probability of being less than not greater than. So, subtract your answer from 1.000
1.000 - 0.119 = .881 or 88.1%
c) I agree with your response to c. With a probability that 12 men selected at random having an 88% probability that the mean of their weights is greater than 167, the capacity should be restated.
Davina D.
04/20/16