Find a combination x

_{1}w_{1}+x_{2}w_{2}+x_{3}w_{3}that gives the zero vector: w_{1}=[1, 2, 3], w_{2}=[4, 5, 6], w_{3}=[7, 8, 9].The answer is (1/2)w

_{1}-w_{2}+(1/2)w_{3}.-
CREATE FREE ACCOUNT
- Access thousands of free resources from expert tutors
- Comment on posts and interact with the authors
- Ask questions and get free answers from tutors
- View videos, take interactive quizzes, and more!

- Become a Student
- Become a Student
- Sign In

Find a combination x_{1}w_{1}+x_{2}w_{2}+x_{3}w_{3} that gives the zero vector: w_{1}=[1, 2, 3], w_{2}=[4, 5, 6], w_{3}=[7, 8, 9].

The answer is (1/2)w_{1}-w_{2}+(1/2)w_{3}.

Tutors, please sign in to answer this question.

It sounds like you might be in a linear algebra course or maybe you're taking an advanced algebra or precalculus course. There are several different expected ways to answer this question depending on which course you're taking and the material you've learned so far. A cumbersome-but-most-likely-to-be-familiar solution method is to avoid vectors entirely by converting the vector equation into a system of three equations and three unknowns:

x_{1} + 4x_{2} + 7x_{3} = 0

2x_{1} + 5x_{2} + 8x_{3} = 0

3x_{1} + 6x_{2} + 9x_{3} = 0

Solve the top equation for x_{1} in terms of x_{2} and x_{3}. Next, use that equation by substituting for x_{1} in the bottom two equations. The end result will be that you'll have two equations with two unknowns, but they're dependent equations. They'll describe the same line. You can see that by multiplying both sides of one equation by a constant to obtain the other one.

You should be able to determine that both equations predict that x_{2} = –2x_{3} . Substituting this equality back into your equation for x_{1} in terms of x2 and x3 will yield x_{1} = x_{3}. And that's it. You have an infinite number of possible solutions.

Pick any three numbers where the first and third are the same and the second is –2 times the others, and you have values for your x's that work. The answer you listed is a solution but it's uglier than the combination where x_{1}=x_{3}=1 and x_{2}=–2. With these choices, w_{1} – 2w_{2} +w_{3} also equals the zero vector, it's much prettier, and it's the sort of answer you'll be expected to give soon if you're taking a linear algebra course once you begin working with eigenvectors.

Here's a wolfram alpha solution using the above method: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve+x1%2B4x2%2B7x3+%3D+0%2C+2x1%2B5x2%2B8x3+%3D+0%2C+3x1%2B6x2%2B9x3+%3D+0

Here's one with vectors: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve+x1{1%2C2%2C3}%2Bx2{4%2C5%2C6}%2Bx3{7%2C8%2C9}%3D{0%2C0%2C0}

If you're learning about matrix equations then this may be useful: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve+{{1%2C2%2C3}%2C{4%2C5%2C6}%2C{7%2C8%2C9}}{{x1}%2C{x2}%2C{x3}}%3D0

Related to the matrix equation, if you're learning about determinants, invertibility, and linear dependence then these may be useful:

determinant is zero: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=det+{{1%2C+2%2C+3}%2C+{4%2C+5%2C+6}%2C+{7%2C+8%2C+9}}

not invertible (singular): http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Inverse+matrix+of+{{1%2C2%2C3}%2C{4%2C5%2C6}%2C{7%2C8%2C9}}

dependent system: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=linear+independence+of+{{1%2C2%2C3}%2C+{4%2C5%2C6}%2C+{7%2C8%2C9}}

If your linear algebra course is moving on to eigensystems soon then this is an example of finding an eigenvector corresponding to an eigenvalue of zero.

and

Irene P.

Enthusiastic astronomy, physics, math tutor

Brooklyn, NY

4.9
(27 ratings)

Jonathan S.

Certified Physics Teacher, Experienced with SAT Math and English

Bloomfield, NJ

5.0
(1 ratings)

Brian G.

Math tutor for high school and college students

Highland Park, NJ

4.8
(13 ratings)