Isaac C. answered 06/29/16
Tutor
4.9
(823)
Physics, Chemistry, Math, and Computer Programming Tutor
While ignoring lower order polynomial terms works to give a quick yes/no result, the method may not get full credit if you are asked to show your work using the comparison test. Ignoring lower order term may produce a series that may be larger than the series to which you want to make your comparison. In the case where you are trying to prove divergence, comparing your result to a larger series is not conclusive. You need to producing a smaller, diverging series for this problem. Dropping the 3 from 2n+3 works, but dropping the lower order 3n+1 from the denominator makes the denominator smaller and the overall expression larger. Not good. A different strategy is needed for the denominator.
One method that is acceptable is to use the comparison test.
we can note that 2n < 2n+3 for all n
and that the denominator (n2+3n + 1) is always less than 4n2 for any n > 2
Decreasing the numerator while increasing the denominator is guaranteed to produce a smaller fraction. Accordingly we can compare say that each of the terms of the given series are greater than 2n/4n2 or 1/2n for all n > 2. Since 1/n diverges, then (1/2)*(1/n) also diverges, and our original series is greater than a known divergent series. This method of applying the comparison test is known to be sufficient for a calculus test.