Stephanie M. answered 06/11/15
Tutor
5.0
(887)
Essay and Creative Writing Tutor with 5+ Years of Experience
(a)
We'd like to find out the probability that a standard-exceeding return is fraudulent and the probability that a normal return is fraudulent, then add those together.
14% of the returns exceed the standard, and 20% of those are fraudulent. That's a probability of 0.14(0.2) = 0.028.
100 - 14 = 86% of the returns are normal, and 3% of those are fraudulent. That's a probability of 0.86(0.03) = 0.0258.
That's a total of 0.028 + 0.0258 = 0.0538 fraudulent returns, or 5.38%.
(b)
We'd like to find P(standard-exceeding|fraudulent), or P(E|F).
P(E|F) = (P(F|E)P(E)) / P(F)
P(F|E), or P(fraudulent|standard-exceeding), was given as 0.2.
P(E), or P(standard-exceeding), was given as 0.14.
P(F), or P(fraudulent), was just calculated as 0.0538.
So:
P(E|F) = (P(F|E)P(E)) / P(F)
P(E|F) = ((0.2)(0.14)) / 0.0538
P(E|F) = 0.028/0.0538
P(E|F) = 0.520
That's pretty crazy. Even if the IRS has methods in place to check the returns that are standard-exceeding, and only a tiny portion of regular returns are fraudulent, about 50% of fraudulent returns won't get caught.
That's because there are so many more regular returns than standard-exceeding ones... The "tiny portion" of that large number winds up being about the same as the fraudulent 20% of standard-exceeding returns.