
William W. answered 02/07/25
Math and science made easy - learn from a retired engineer
There is a method for solving cubics (similar to the quadratic formula) BUT it is very complicated. I built a little Excel file that does it - and it works - but like I said, it's super complicated.
Normally, I would say that for something like the equation you listed, use the Rational Roots Theorem and synthetic division.
IF there is a rational solution, it will be one of the factors of 1575 divided by one of the factors of 4. The factors of 1575 are:
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 21, 25, 35, 45, 63, 75, 105, 175, 225, 315, 525, and 1575 and the factors of 4 are 1, 2, and 4 so plus or minus any of the various combinations.
Start easy, with 1. Using synthetic division, we get a remainder of -2070 so (1, -2070) is on the curve.
Try -1, using synthetic division, we get a remainder of -1080 so (-1, -1080) is on the curve.
It looks like we're getting closer to a zero, so go a little more negative: Try -3 and we get a remainder of -186 so (-3, -186) is on the curve so it appears we are getting closer to a zero.
Try -5: using synthetic division, we get a remainder of 420 so (-5, 420) is on the curve meaning we passed the zero. Looking at the possible combinations, I see that I can get -3.5 by dividing 7 and 2. So try -3.5: Using synthetic division, we get a remainder of 0 so x = -3.5 is a root. The synthetic division reveals that the quotient when dividing by (R + 3.5) is 4R2 -14R - 450. We can either factor this using regular quadratic trinomial methods or use the quadratic formula. Since it's still fairly complicated, I used the quadratic formula and got R = 12.5 and R = -9 resulting in the following factorization:
R3 - 499R - 1575 = 4(R + 3.5)(R - 12.5)(R + 9)
Breaking the leading coefficient into two "2's" and incorporating a 2 into each of the "decimal" terms, we get:
R3 - 499R - 1575 = (2R + 7)(2R - 25)(R + 9)