
Youzhe H.
asked 07/10/24Linear algebra question: does it have a solution?
Given $k\in\mathbb{N}$, $p$ a prime number, $s = (s_1, s_2,..., s_{2k+1})\in \mathbb{M}_{(2k+1)*1}(\mathbb{F}_p)$, the Hankel matrix generated by s is denoted as H.
$$
H = \begin{pmatrix}
s_1 & s_2 & \cdots & s_{k+1} \\
s_2 & s_3 & \cdots & s_{k+2} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
s_{k+1} & s_{k+2} & \cdots & s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
$$
Now we know that H is of full rank. Question: do there exist $c = (n_1,n_2,\dots,n_{k+1})\in\mathbb{M}_{1*(k+1)}(\mathbb{F}_p)$ and $b = (b_1,b_2,\dots, b_{k+1})^T\in\mathbb{M}_{(k+1)*1}(\mathbb{F}_p)$ such that the following system holds:
$$\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\
n_1 & n_2 & \cdots & n_{k+1} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
n_1^{2k} & n_2^{2k} & \cdots & n_{k+1}^{2k}
\end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}
b_1 \\ b_2\\ \vdots\\b_{k+1}
\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}
s_1\\s_2\\\vdots\\\vdots\\s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}$$
1 Expert Answer

Ross M. answered 07/10/24
PhD in Mathematics with Expertise in Discrete Math and 10+ Years Teach
Given \( k \in \mathbb{N} \), \( p \) a prime number, \( s = (s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_{2k+1}) \in \mathbb{M}_{(2k+1) \times 1} (\mathbb{F}_p) \), the Hankel matrix generated by \( s \) is denoted as \( H \):
\[
H = \begin{pmatrix}
s_1 & s_2 & \cdots & s_{k+1} \\
s_2 & s_3 & \cdots & s_{k+2} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
s_{k+1} & s_{k+2} & \cdots & s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
We know that \( H \) is of full rank. The question is whether there exist \( c = (n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1}) \in \mathbb{M}_{1 \times (k+1)} (\mathbb{F}_p) \) and \( b = (b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{k+1})^T \in \mathbb{M}_{(k+1) \times 1} (\mathbb{F}_p) \) such that the following system holds:
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\
n_1 & n_2 & \cdots & n_{k+1} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
n_1^{2k} & n_2^{2k} & \cdots & n_{k+1}^{2k}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
b_1 \\ b_2 \\ \vdots \\ b_{k+1}
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
s_1 \\ s_2 \\ \vdots \\ s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
Yes, such vectors \( c = (n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1}) \) and \( b = (b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{k+1})^T \) exist. This is guaranteed by the fact that the Hankel matrix \( H \) is of full rank. Here's a detailed explanation:
Given the Hankel matrix \( H \) generated by the sequence \( s = (s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_{2k+1}) \):
\[
H = \begin{pmatrix}
s_1 & s_2 & \cdots & s_{k+1} \\
s_2 & s_3 & \cdots & s_{k+2} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
s_{k+1} & s_{k+2} & \cdots & s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
we know that \( H \) is of full rank, meaning its rank is \( k+1 \).
The problem is to find vectors \( c = (n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1}) \) and \( b = (b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{k+1})^T \) such that the following Vandermonde matrix equation holds:
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\
n_1 & n_2 & \cdots & n_{k+1} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
n_1^{2k} & n_2^{2k} & \cdots & n_{k+1}^{2k}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
b_1 \\ b_2 \\ \vdots \\ b_{k+1}
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
s_1 \\ s_2 \\ \vdots \\ s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
This can be rephrased as finding a solution to a system where the Vandermonde matrix is constructed from the roots \( n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1} \).
Since \( H \) is of full rank, it means that the sequence \( s \) can be represented in the form of a linear combination of powers of \( n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1} \). Specifically, there exist distinct elements \( n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1} \) in \( \mathbb{F}_p \) and coefficients \( b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{k+1} \) such that:
\[ s_m = \sum_{j=1}^{k+1} b_j n_j^{m-1} \quad \text{for} \quad m = 1, 2, \ldots, 2k+1 \]
This is equivalent to the system:
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\
n_1 & n_2 & \cdots & n_{k+1} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
n_1^{2k} & n_2^{2k} & \cdots & n_{k+1}^{2k}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
b_1 \\ b_2 \\ \vdots \\ b_{k+1}
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
s_1 \\ s_2 \\ \vdots \\ s_{2k+1}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
The Vandermonde matrix on the left-hand side is known to be non-singular if the \( n_i \) are distinct. Hence, the existence of a unique solution \( b = (b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{k+1})^T \) is guaranteed, provided the \( n_i \) are chosen to be distinct elements in \( \mathbb{F}_p \).
Therefore, such vectors \( c \) and \( b \) exist, and they satisfy the given matrix equation.
Youzhe H.
The Vandemonde matrix is not square.07/11/24

Ross M.
Okay, what does it change? What does H is of full rank mean? It is a little bit hard to go through all the details of your problem here. But anyway, look again the details.07/11/24
Youzhe H.
The Vandermonde matrix on the left-hand side is known to be non-singular if the \( n_i \) are distinct. That's from your last paragraph and the Vandermonde matrix is non-square. However, H is square and of full rank. Could you please elaborate more on this sentence: 'Since \( H \) is of full rank, it means that the sequence \( s \) can be represented in the form of a linear combination of powers of \( n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_{k+1} \).'?07/12/24
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Bradford T.
Apparently this did not translate to wyzant well. Can you redo with regular text characters?07/10/24