Mauricio Q. answered 10/31/23
MBA Berkeley - Graduate Economics and Finances Engineer
FALSE.
In the scenario where the firm's production function is Q = 2L + 3K, and the prices of labor and capital are 4 and 6, respectively, it's not necessarily true that the firm should always hire as much labor as capital.
To decide the most cost-effective combination of labor (L) and capital (K), we consider the marginal products of each input relative to their costs:
• Marginal Product of Labor (MPL) = 2 (the coefficient of L in the production function).
• Marginal Product of Capital (MPK) = 3 (the coefficient of K in the production function).
We compare the ratio of the marginal product to the price for each input:
• For labor: MPL/Price of Labor = 2/4 = 0.5
• For capital: MPK/Price of Capital = 3/6 = 0.5
Since the marginal product per dollar spent is the same for both labor and capital, there's no inherent cost advantage in favoring one over the other. The firm should consider other factors like total input budget, availability of resources, and specific production conditions to decide the mix of labor and capital.
Therefore, the statement "If the price of labor is exactly 4, it should always hire as much labor as capital" is false.
The optimal mix of labor and capital depends on factors beyond their prices and marginal products