
Akhil I. answered 01/10/22
Physics Graduate highly skilled in Mathematics & Physics
The first step to solving this inequality is finding its domain.
ln(x) is only defined for (0, +∞) or x>0
2ln(2x-3) is defined when (2x-3)>0, simplifying we get x>3/2
ln(x-1) is defined when (x-1)>0, simplifying we get x>1
To solve the given inequality both the functions must exist, so we must find the values of x for which both the logarithmic functions are defined.
When we merge the overlapping intervals of x>1 and x>3/2 we get x>3/2. You can use a number line to find the overlapping interval.
So our first condition is x>3/2 which we will call eq(1).
Now we can solve for the inequality, 2ln(2x-3) > ln(x-1)
Firstly, we will rewrite 2ln(2x-3) as ln(2x-3)2, this step is to get equivalent expressions on both sides.
ln(2x-3)2 > ln(x-1) both sides are a log function with the same base e.
Plotting the graph of ln(x), we can notice that as x increases ln(x) also increases.
Therefore (2x-3)2 > (x-1)
4x2-12x+9 > x-1, now adding both sides with (1-x) we get
4x2-13x+10 > 0
Factorizing we get (4x-5)(x-2) > 0
So x < 5/4 or x>2 which we will call eq(2)
Finally we will find the overlapping intervals of eq(1) and eq(2). Plotting these intervals on a number line we get the interval x > 2. Hence 2ln(2x-3) > ln(x-1) for x > 2.