Raymond B. answered 12/23/20
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
To graph the constraints, change them to equalities
B+F = 20 (thousand)
B=3F
F=5
Put F on the y axis, B on the x axis
F=5 adds nothing. It's redundant since satisfying the other two constraints automatically satisfies F<5
B+F = 20 is a downward sloping line, at negative 45 degrees, with x intercept = 20 and y intercept =20
B+3F is an upward sloping line through the origin
those two lines intersect at (15,5) the optimal point with 5,000 invested in mutual funds and 15000 invested in bonds. The triangle with vertices (15,5) (20,0) and (0,0) enclose all the possibilities of investing
shade every thing below the B+F =20 line as the inequality allowed B+F<20
and shade everything below B=3F as the allowed inequality, B>3F
where the 2 shadings of those inequalities overlap gives the potential investments possible given the constrains
Brian P.
Thank you, I was able to break this down and make "some" sense of it. Do you have any resources where I could practice these types of problems?12/23/20