
Jack H. answered 01/27/15
Tutor
4.7
(3)
Professional Computer Geek
Sorry I must have answered before you had the complete question posted ...
In this case phantom profit would be the difference between the costs incurred in using FIFO instead of LIFO.
The company purchased 260+360+300=920 units. If there are 330 left in inventory then they sold 920-330=590 units.
Using FiFO the first 260 units of the 590 would be costed at $8/unit. The next 330 would be from the next purchase at $9. So total cost is: 260*8(2080) + 330*9(2970) = $5050
Using LIFO the first 300 would be costed at $10, and the next 290 at $9. So the total cost would be 300x10(3000) + 290x9(2610) = 5610.
Thus the difference between the costs, or phantom profit, would be 5610-5050 =$560.
In this case phantom profit would be the difference between the costs incurred in using FIFO instead of LIFO.
The company purchased 260+360+300=920 units. If there are 330 left in inventory then they sold 920-330=590 units.
Using FiFO the first 260 units of the 590 would be costed at $8/unit. The next 330 would be from the next purchase at $9. So total cost is: 260*8(2080) + 330*9(2970) = $5050
Using LIFO the first 300 would be costed at $10, and the next 290 at $9. So the total cost would be 300x10(3000) + 290x9(2610) = 5610.
Thus the difference between the costs, or phantom profit, would be 5610-5050 =$560.
John W.
Using LIFO, I followed the example until I got to 290*9. Where did 290 come from?
Report
12/12/15
Destiny P.
01/27/15