Larry C. answered 11/25/18
Computer Science and Mathematics professional
This is an example of an 'exclusive OR'. By the first sentence, we know that there bear ate something, at least one of which was fish or honey. Without the second sentence, it would be possible for the bear to have eaten both but that second sentence eliminates the possibility: if the bear ate fish, it did not eat honey and this implies if the bear ate honey, it did not eat fish. However, the third case is not upheld, since it possible that the bear DID eat honey - merely if it did, it did not eat fish.
Youssef E.
This is not a transformation of the sentence into symbolic form.11/25/18