Dayaan M. answered 08/26/26
Scored 5/5 on Algebra 2 EOC | 5 Years of Tutoring Experience
Let us take Megan first. She has x^(1/3) divided by x^(1/12), and since the bases are the same, we use the quotient rule for exponents, which says you subtract the exponents:
x^(1/3) / x^(1/12) = x^(1/3 - 1/12)
Now we just have to subtract those fractions, which means finding a common denominator. Twelve works, since 1/3 is the same as 4/12:
4/12 - 1/12 = 3/12 = 1/4
So Megan's expression simplifies to x^(1/4), which is the fourth root of x.
Now Julie. She has the thirty second root of x times x^2 times x^5. Start inside the radical, because when you multiply powers with the same base you ADD the exponents, and remember that a lone x is really x^1:
x^1 times x^2 times x^5 = x^(1 + 2 + 5) = x^8
So she has the thirty second root of x^8. A root turns into a fractional exponent, where the index of the root becomes the denominator:
(x^8)^(1/32)
Now the power rule says to multiply the exponents:
x^(8/32)
And 8/32 reduces, since both divide by 8:
x^(1/4)
Remember, the last part of the question asks whether they started with equivalent expressions. Notice that both of them landed on exactly the same place, x^(1/4). So yes, Megan and Julie started with equivalent expressions. They just looked completely different because one was written as a quotient of fractional powers and the other was written as a root of a product. Once each one is simplified, they turn out to be two different disguises for the same thing.
So, our final answer is that both expressions simplify to x^(1/4), the fourth root of x, and the two girls did start with equivalent expressions.