Raymond B. answered 08/13/23
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
it costs kneeland one wadget to produce one widget and vice versa
it costs freeland two wadgets to produce one widget and costs 1/2 widget to produce 1 wadget
widgets are cheaper in kneeland, twice as cheap
wadgets are cheaper in freeland, twice as cheap
wadgets in freeland cost 1/2 widget
wadgets in kneeland cost 1 widget
widgets in kneeland cost 1 wadget
widgets in freeland cost 2 wadgets
freeland has a comparative advantage in wadgets
kneeland has a comparative advantage in widgets
freeland has an absolute advantage in both but his is irrelevant to trade with kneeland
if the price of widgets is set between 1 and 2 wadgets
trade is mutually beneficial to both countries
but the consumers may put a limit on trade if they have input into the price
still given the way the problem reads, local consumption is a very small percent of the total trade, so it makes relatively small impact on the international price