Raymond B. answered 08/15/21
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
1
1/2 = e^-6.345t for half life, not a2=ae^-6.345t
ln(.5) = -6.345t
t = ln.5/-6.345 = 0.1092 days or a little over 2 1/2 hours
odds are though 6.345 should have been 0.06345
634.5% decay rate looks far too rapid
Use 0.06345 and t = 10.92 days or almost 11 days for half life
2
2538 today, 20% depreciation each year, after 4 years?
each year's value is 80% of the previous year
year value
0 2538
1 2030.4
2 1624.32
3 1299.456
4 1039.5648 = 1039.56 to the nearest penny
4 .174 left with half life of 5730 years
how old is it?
5730= ln,5/k where k= the decay rate
k=ln.5/5730 = -0.000121
.1771% = .001771
.001771 = e^-.000121t
t = ln.001771/.000121 = 14.636 years ago
but you probably meant 17.71% = 0.1771
then
0.1771 = e^-.000121t
t = 14,306 years old bone
3
the equation should read
a =2ae^-7.571t
2a =ae^-7.571t is for doubling time, not half time
You probably also may have missed the decimal point on the decay rate. It probably should be .07571 not 7.571
but ignore that decay rate problem and
1 = 2e^-7.571t with t measured in days
divide by 2
1/2 = e^-7.571t
take natural logs of both sides
ln(1/2) = -7.571t
t = ln(1/2)/-7.571 =approximately 0.091553 days
which makes sense as 7.571 means 757.1% decay rate. It's half gone in a 1/10 of a day
but try .07571 as the decay rate, which is 7.571% per day, instead of 757.1% per diem
1/2 = e^-.07571t
ln(1/2) =- ,07571t
t = ln(.5)/-.07571 = about 9.1553 days or 9 days and almost 4 hours.
if you had used the given equation with a2 or 2a on the left side, you end up with a negative time for the half life
6
126,000 to 156,000 in 8 years
at steady growth rate
156 = 126e^8r
8r = ln(156/126)/8 = about 0.0267 = 2.67% growth rate