
Jonathan T. answered 09/24/23
Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Equations for College
ย Solve the following differential equation, ๐๐ฅ๐๐ก =9๐ฅ๐11๐ฅ+๐ก.ย
Let x(t) be the solution with initial value ๐ฅ(0)=1. If ๐ก0 = (โln(111089)๐11+1), find the value of ๐ฅ(๐ก0) with the answer rounded to exactly 4 digits after the decimal point.ย
[1] Always identify the type of ODE given prior to solving. This will not only maximize points on exams, it will give you the formula for the solution.ย
This is a first order separable differential equation. (It is a Calculus II question and nothing more.)ย
๐(๐ฅ,๐ก)=๐๐ฅ๐๐ก โ ๐(๐ฅ)๐(๐ก)=๐๐ฅ๐๐ก โ โซ๐(๐ก)๐๐ก=โซ๐(๐ฅ)๐๐ฅย
See how it breaks into two basic integrals.ย
NOTE: ๐๐ฅ๐๐ก means ๐ฅ is the dependent variable and ๐ก is the independent. We solve for ๐ฅ(๐ก).ย
[2] Apply the formula.ย
๐๐ฅ๐๐ก =9๐ฅ๐11๐ฅ+๐ก โ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ก =9๐ฅ๐11๐ฅ๐๐ก โ ๐ฅ๐11๐ฅ๐๐ฅ=9๐โ๐ก๐๐กย
โ โซ๐ฅ๐11๐ฅ๐๐ฅ=โซ9๐โ๐ก๐๐กย
You will do IBPs on the left.ย
111๐11 ๐ฅ ๐ฅ โ๐11 ๐ฅ121+๐1=โ9๐โ๐ก+๐2 โ 1121๐11 ๐ฅ( 11๐ฅโ1)=โ9๐โ๐ก+๐ถย
[3] Solve for ๐ถ by evaluating the solution at ๐ฅ(0)=1.ย
1121๐11 (1)( 11(1)โ1)=โ9๐โ(0)+๐ถ โ ๐ถ = 9 +10 ๐11121ย
Now, just evaluate 1121๐11 ๐ฅ( 11๐ฅโ1)=โ9๐โ๐ก+9 +10 ๐11121 at ๐ก0 = (โln(111089)๐11+1) you will need to use whatever your professor wants for calculator. Could be MATLAB or something relatedโฆ I will leave this part to you.ย

Jonathan T.
Plug it into Wolfram.09/24/23
Matthew K.
The approach that you have outlined, with respect, appears to me to contain a few errors and discrepancies. 1. Identification of ODE: The statement correctly identifies the differential equation as a first-order separable ODE. 2. Separation of Variables: The solution attempts to separate variables correctly but appears to have made an algebraic mistake when writing \( \frac{dx}{dt} = 9xe^{11x+t} \) as \( \frac{dx}{dt} = 9xe^{11x}e^t \). The original equation is \( \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{9}{x e^{11x + t}} \), and when separating the variables, it should result in \( x e^{11x + t} dx = 9 dt \). 3. Integration: The solution then shows integration using integration by parts (IBP) on the left-hand side. This is a correct method, but the calculations themselves are flawed. It seems like the \( e^{-t} \) term is added without justification, and the integration by parts appears incorrect. 4. Solving for \( C \): The solution does attempt to solve for the constant \( C \) using the initial condition \( x(0) = 1 \). However, due to the previous mistakes, the equation for \( C \) will also be incorrect. 5. Evaluating at \( t_0 \): The solution does mention that the final step is to evaluate the solution at \( t_0 \), which is correct. However, again, due to the mistakes in integration and in finding \( C \), this step would also likely yield the wrong answer. I am working on a solution myself and I think I am almost there. I will post my thoughts on this once complete. With regards to this response, in my opinion, the approach is on the right track by identifying the type of ODE and attempting to use separation of variables, but the algebraic and calculus errors make the solution incorrect.09/24/23