Asked • 06/24/19

How are SN2 transition states stabilised by adjacent double bonds and carbonyl groups?

It is my understanding that transition states in an S<sub>N</sub>2 reaction have some filled and some empty orbital character, as we have the backside of the **C-X σ*** beginning to fill with electrons from the **HOMO** of the nucleophile, forming a **C-Nu σ** bond in the process. If we have an adjacent carbonyl group to the **α** carbon, I have learnt that the TS is then only stabilised by the **C-O π***, i.e. by electron withdrawal and not by the **C-O π**. However, with adjacent double bonds, I have learnt that the TS is stabilised by both the **C-C π** and the **C-C π***. I was wondering why this would be the case, as looking at the shape of the orbitals, there seems no reason that the **C-O π** could not align itself so that the partly-empty p orbital in the TS is parallel to the lobes of this MO, therefore stabilising the TS as new lower energy MOs form. Also, with regard to the best representation of these structures, I always see partial negative charges on the Leaving group and the Nucleophile in the transition state, but never the positive charge located on the **α** carbon. Surely if with adjacent carbonyl groups we only have stabilisation by electron withdrawal, it is valid to put the partial positive charge there?

1 Expert Answer

By:

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.