I think there is no answer here because there is no way to draw on this but I will try to explain this the best I can:
A: The increase in the price of rubber shifts the supply of rubber to the left increasing the equilibrium price and decreasing the equilibrium quantity.
B: It's a surplus though I can not say how large a surplus because there is no other data.
C: The demand curve shifts to the right raising both the equilibrium price and quantity.
D: The demand curve shifts to the left lowering both the equilibrium price and quantity.
E: The equilibrium price will go down because suppliers will lower the price in order to generate demand.
F: If the government subsidized production, the price would decrease and the quantity would increase. When demand increases, both the price and quantity increase. So quantity will increase but price will be ambiguous. You cannot know what will happen to price without knowing whether demand increasing or the government subsidy had the greater effect.
G: The social media influencer will increase the demand for the good, creating a shortage as many people will want the goods at their current price and the supplier will not be able to keep up. This is the state of disequilibrium. Afterwards, the supplier should raise their price, and the shortage will go away as fewer people demand the good.