Ali B.

asked • 01/18/20

Consider a representative consumer with the following lifetime utility: 

Consider a representative consumer with the following lifetime utility: 


U(C0,C1)=C-C20/2 +0.5E(C1-C21 /2)

Consumer's income Y0 at time t = 0 equals 10 with probability 1, while income Y  may be equal to either 40 (optimistic scenario) or 0 (pessimistic scenario). The probabilities for the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios to occur are, respectively, 25% and 75%. Interest rate is normalized to zero.

a)     Compute the permanent income   Yp=0.5Y0+EY1

b)     Show that C0=Yp

c)   that C0=Yp is often referred to as the situation of no precautionary saving. What does that mean and does that make sense? Explain.

d)     M. Kimball, in his seminal paper Precautionary savings in the small and in the large" (Econometrica, 1990) defined a measure of consumer's prudence given by -u’"(C)C/ u"(C), where u is the instantaneous utility function of consumer's time-separable preference. Does this measure make sense to you? Explain (hint: compute this measure for the consumer in this problem and relate the result to your answers to parts (b) - (c)).

Lenny D.

This is the link to the answer to your IS LM question https://www.wyzant.com/resources/answers/737559/hicksian-is-lm-framework-and-conditions-of-policy-effectiveness
Report

01/19/20

Lenny D.

Have you been able to come up with a better formulation of U(C0,C1) which doesn't violate no-satiation. With this, Expected utility is maximized when C0, C1 = 1 this occurs when C0 =1 and C1 = S = 1 Y0-c0-S =8 which you give away and whatever y1 becomes you give that away as well.
Report

01/20/20

1 Expert Answer

By:

Lenny D. answered • 01/18/20

Tutor
4.8 (563)

Global Macroeconomic Expert

Lenny D.

You are clearly trying to have some form of quadratic utility which implies Increasing absolute risk aversion. Kimball's measure smell's like the elasticity of Absolute risk aversion with respect to C.
Report

01/19/20

Lenny D.

search"answered questions" on this site under Macroeconomics for Hicksian IS LM and you'll see my answer to your other question
Report

01/19/20

Lenny D.

Have you been able to come up with a better formulation of U(C0,C1) which doesn't violate no-satiation. With this, Expected utility is maximized when C0, C1 = 1 this occurs when C0 =1 and C1 = S = 1 Y0-c0-S =8 which you give away and whatever y1 becomes you give that away as well.
Report

01/21/20

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.