
Andy C. answered 09/17/17
Tutor
4.9
(27)
Math/Physics Tutor
Given: a<0; b<0
Prove : -(a+b)/2 >= sqrt(ab)
a<0 means a^2 >0
b<0 means b^2 >0
Then ab>0 and a^2 + b^2 > 0
let t = sqrt(ab)
a+b<0 means -(a+b)>0
so -(a+b)/2 > 0
The proof will be completed in two parts,
by contradiction, first with t=sqrt(ab)>0,
then with t=sqrt(ab)<0
Suppose 0 <-(a+b)/2 < t =sqrt(ab).
0 < -(a+b) < 2*t = 2*sqrt(ab) <--- multiplies everything by 2
0 > a+b > -2*t = -2*sqrt(ab) <-- multiplies everything by -1
0 > (a+b)^2 > 4ab <-- squaring everything is allowed
0 > a^2 + 2ab + b^2 > 4ab <-- FOIL ; squaring binomial
-2ab > a^2 + b^2 > 2ab <--- subtracts 2ab from everything
This is a contradiction because ab>0 and a^2 +b^2 >0 while -2ab <0.
This completes the proof for sqrt(ab)>0
Suppose 0 > t=sqrt(ab) > -(a+b)/2.
0 > 2*t = 2*sqrt(ab) > -(a+b) <--- multiplies everything by 2
0 < -2*sqrt(ab) < (a+b) <--- multiplies everything by -1
But 0 > a+b, because a<0 and b<0.
So 0 < -2*sqrt(ab) < a+b < 0.
Prove : -(a+b)/2 >= sqrt(ab)
a<0 means a^2 >0
b<0 means b^2 >0
Then ab>0 and a^2 + b^2 > 0
let t = sqrt(ab)
a+b<0 means -(a+b)>0
so -(a+b)/2 > 0
The proof will be completed in two parts,
by contradiction, first with t=sqrt(ab)>0,
then with t=sqrt(ab)<0
Suppose 0 <-(a+b)/2 < t =sqrt(ab).
0 < -(a+b) < 2*t = 2*sqrt(ab) <--- multiplies everything by 2
0 > a+b > -2*t = -2*sqrt(ab) <-- multiplies everything by -1
0 > (a+b)^2 > 4ab <-- squaring everything is allowed
0 > a^2 + 2ab + b^2 > 4ab <-- FOIL ; squaring binomial
-2ab > a^2 + b^2 > 2ab <--- subtracts 2ab from everything
This is a contradiction because ab>0 and a^2 +b^2 >0 while -2ab <0.
This completes the proof for sqrt(ab)>0
Suppose 0 > t=sqrt(ab) > -(a+b)/2.
0 > 2*t = 2*sqrt(ab) > -(a+b) <--- multiplies everything by 2
0 < -2*sqrt(ab) < (a+b) <--- multiplies everything by -1
But 0 > a+b, because a<0 and b<0.
So 0 < -2*sqrt(ab) < a+b < 0.
Moreover -2*sqrt(ab) > 0 since sqrt(ab) <0 by supposition.
This is a big-time, train wreck contradiction: 0 < positive < negative < 0.
So either t = sqrt(ab)<0 is false or sqrt(ab)> -(a+b)/2
If t = sqrt(ab)<0 is false, then t=sqrt(ab)>=0 in which
case the proof is complete as proven above.
Otherwise the latter statement is false which means
sqrt(ab) <= -(a+b)/2 which completes the proof.
This is a big-time, train wreck contradiction: 0 < positive < negative < 0.
So either t = sqrt(ab)<0 is false or sqrt(ab)> -(a+b)/2
If t = sqrt(ab)<0 is false, then t=sqrt(ab)>=0 in which
case the proof is complete as proven above.
Otherwise the latter statement is false which means
sqrt(ab) <= -(a+b)/2 which completes the proof.

Kenneth S.
09/17/17