Dr Peter Y. answered 09/02/24
Expert Academic writer
To address the first part of the question, we need to analyze the potential for differing loss ratios based on the various endorsement coverage levels (10%, 20%, 50%, and 100%). The current average selected endorsement is 30.2%, and the loss ratios are 90% with the endorsement and 101% without it. Given the different levels of coverage, it is indeed plausible that the loss ratios could vary significantly for each specific endorsement percentage. Each level of coverage may lead to different claims experiences and thus different loss ratios. Therefore, the answer to the first part is correct: Yes, it is possible that the loss ratios would differ
For the second part, regarding the use of the average endorsement of 30.2% to adjust the aggregate loss ratio, we need to consider the implications of using an average. The average endorsement percentage does not directly reflect the specific loss ratios associated with each individual endorsement level. Adjusting the aggregate loss ratio using an average could lead to inaccuracies, as it does not account for the variations in claims that might occur at different coverage levels. Therefore, it is not advisable to use the average endorsement to adjust the aggregate loss ratio without further analysis of how each specific endorsement impacts the loss ratios
In summary, the answers are:
i) Yes, it is possible the loss ratios would differ
ii) No, we cannot accurately use the average endorsement of 30.2% to adjust the aggregate loss ratio