Bobby S. answered 04/23/19
BEST LSAT TUTOR IN PHILLY (Ivy League / 170+)
Intentional torts focus on an intent. The actor has to consciously intend for the outcome to occur. For example, a battery. If you punch someone in the face, you intended to inflict harm upon them, and therefore it is an intentional tort. There is a mental state aspect. On the other hand, negligence doesn't require any intent. You could not have wanted or intended for someone to get hurt, and yet still be liable for negligence. For example, if you are speeding on the road and you get into an accident with someone who gets hurt. Generally, you didn't intend on hurting them. In fact, you wish they weren't hurt. But, you still acted negligently by not adhering to a standard of what a reasonable person would do. Therefore, you would still be liable.