David W. answered 07/15/17
Tutor
4.7
(90)
Experienced Prof
Your math is correct.
You have computed the Theoretical Probability. This is the most likely probability (that is, the number of successful events divided by the total number of events) with "fair" dice (that is, the numbers 1-6 are equally likely to occur). So, given an equal distribution of the events, you may compute the probability of three events happening in succession.
However, the Experimental Probability is what you cite. You used the words, "Through my experimenting," "seems to slow down," and "seems to take longer." So, what you see is not what you would expect. That's because it is still possible, but less likely. For example, it is possible, though not very likely, to flip a "fair" coin five time and get all five heads. That doesn't change the Theoretical Probability, but it does make us re-validate whether the coin is "fair."
As an example: Computer programs often simulate games. They use pseudo-random number generators (the numbers are close to random, but not totally random). Some pseudo-random number generators begin with a "seed" value (that is, a starting value). Using the same seed, the pseudo-random number generator will generate the same sequence of pseudo-random numbers every time. This may be useful for testing the logic of the program, but it makes the game quite predictable. Thus, pseudo-random generators usually have a "randomize" option to get a new seed before generating numbers in a sequence (much like we demand that a deck of cards be shuffled).
You have experienced slightly unexpected (but certainly not impossible) events.